I observe to dense confusions about MMR for some geonvs.Thus,I established clear informations👍
I observe to caused a confusion cond by some geoenvs of Magnetometric Resistivity chapter.Thus,I needed to some clear explanations.
We can classify by two main branch Magnetometric Resistivity applications considering actualtimes;
- Landsurvey concept(Modern example is Willowstick Technique)
- Downhole concept(DMMR)
Note.I emhasize especially expressed selective a cond to needs of some geoenvs based on geologic structures of presentation👍
For other link complementary about Sub-Audio Magnetic system;
https://manualzz.com/doc/36498880/sam---gap-geophysics
Link expressing successes with technic specs of Sub-Audio Magnetic system by Gapgeo;
https://www.gapgeo.com/sub-audio-magnetics/
Additionally,I share to infrmtns about Downhole MMR system of Gapgeo;
https://www.gapgeo.com/downhole-em-mmr/
Most selective publication about Magnetic Induced Polarisation(MIP);
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://gq.mines.gouv.qc.ca/documents/examine/GM38750/GM38750.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwituYGnt6_4AhViQfEDHbEaA-kQFnoECAgQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2p-jnk5klLMbJsvjSXfWe7
Where,as evaluated,understanding clearly selective roles of IPRF-2 frequency domain IP Receiver with MFM-3 high sensitivity vector fluxgate magnetometer for MIP😐
You are right,the magnetic induced polarization (MIP) method determines the variation of the induced polarization and resistivity of the earth through measurements of the magnetic field associated with galvanic current flow in the earth, rather than the electric field, as in the traditional induced polarization (IP) or electrical induced polarization (EIP) method👍
Important differences between the MIP and EIP methods are evident in field practice, mathematical theory, and field results. For example, the MIP method is insensitive to horizontal layering in the earth and reflects only lateral variations in its electrical properties. MIP also provides an enhanced ability to detect the presence of bodies of anomalous electrical properties even through a highly conducting surface layer. For this reason the MIP methods primary application is in regions of highly conducting (e.g., saline) overburden or weathered rock, such as in Australia. MIP responses tend to be more complex and varied in pattern than responses normally encountered in EIP measurements. For example, polarity reversals are the rule in MIP but are rarely encountered in EIP. MIP employs high-sensitivity component magnetometers as basic sensors. These are small relative to the length of the electric dipole sensors normally employed in EIP, and, therefore, provide relatively higher geometric resolving power👍
UPDATE 1/15:
For informations about Tamarack Project;
https://talonmetals.com/talon-metals-identifies-a-highly-conductive-anomaly-extending-east-of-the-current-massive-sulphide-unit-with-new-downhole-magneto-metric-resistivity-mmr-survey/
https://talonmetals.com/talon-metals-commences-drill-program-at-tamarack/
https://talonmetals.com/advancing-the-tamarack-project-upcoming-work-program-and-initiative-to-evaluate-producing-nickel-sulphates-for-the-battery-market/
https://talonmetals.com/what-are-you-doing-to-make-a-new-discovery/
https://talonmetals.com/talon-drilling-update-10-54-meter-34-6-feet-intercept-of-wide-mixed-massive-sulphides-logged-at-the-tamarack-project/
UPDATE 1/16:
For a link information summarying advantageous points of DHMMR by DHEM;
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://scholar.google.com.tr/scholar_url%3Furl%3Dhttps://www.911metallurgist.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/DHMMR-Coming-of-Age.pdf%26hl%3Dtr%26sa%3DX%26ei%3DN03FY5msFY_mmgG4x5iYCw%26scisig%3DAAGBfm3Wycr8TxVbfNSx69Y3DrSBT-k_7w%26oi%3Dscholarr&ved=2ahUKEwiv0Nurlcz8AhVJSvEDHRbgCTQQgAN6BAgIEAE&usg=AOvVaw0tAtjedtILb5w1ikyVIZ1m
A link information about discussing DHMMR system by hydrogeologic concept;
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1983.tb01087.x
For link summarying role of MMR method for mapping a fault;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237170854_The_Magnetometric_Resistivity_Method_and_its_Application_to_the_Mapping_of_a_Fault
UPDATE 1/18:
Link including informations about Agnew-Wiluna massive nickel sulphide deposit and Poseidon massive nickel sulphide deposit;
https://www.cambridge.org/ba/download_file/825698/
Example of Thalanga deposits;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248902768_The_Down-hole_Magnetometric_Resistivity_DHMMR_Method/link/57ec73a208ae93b7fa95962b/download
A report by Mr.Abraham Dros;
https://www.juniorminingnetwork.com/junior-miner-news/press-releases/2785-tsx-venture/air/79408-clean-air-metals-announces-addition-of-second-drill-and-commencement-of-phase-2-drilling-at-escape-lake-thunder-bay-north.html
Flying Doctor(Broken Hill) Experiment;
https://www.academia.edu/20672274/Simultaneous_modelling_of_the_phase_and_amplitude_components_of_downhole_magnetometric_resistivity_data
A link about borehole EM&MMR Methods for weak conductors;
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1071/ASEG2001ab002
Update 1/19:
SWestern Australia Experiment;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237756322_Horses_for_conductive_courses_DHEM_and_DHMMR/link/5586559108ae71f6ba900c95/download
Eloise Deposit DHEM Experiment;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238396235_Drillhole_EM_A_Strictly_Scientific_Hokey-Pokey/link/5efaa2ed45851550507e04f2/download
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248903104_Geophysical_Characteristics_of_the_Eloise_Cu-Au_Deposit_North-West_Queensland
DHEM Surveys for Cindered Coal in the Sydney Basin;
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248902510_Sign_Changes_in_DHEM_Surveys_for_Cindered_Coal_in_the_Sydney_Basin/link/594f58afaca27248ae3d06cd/download
.PNG)
Yorumlar
Yorum Gönder