Actual discoveries on D-Region Absorbtion Data

 Last times are observing selective devs about activity of Sun!!!And thus,I sign to density of some works for far region earthquakes based on latitute zone related...You are right!Appealing geoenvironments as very popular D-Region Absorbtion Data among this works(You know that we clearly express on experiments summaried a target position of minimal extend zones for  env. of 10000  radius✋).In this mean,I share a cond. as related to geometry  selective seismic event.Data Summary;

I know on individual experiments  established  of perfect informations to needs of some geoenvironments for 0-5 MHz Zone👍For example,zone areas related of upper map thus very very meaningful✋By the way,my idea developed  for this type zones can summary as effect regions caused of 'instant heat mechanism'🙏

Thanks.I will wait for valuable replies on experiments

Ekrem Erkuş

Geophysics Engineer

UPDATE 12/24:

We are identifying for selective regions  '13-17 Mhz range of 5000&3-7 Mhz range of 10000' patern by a  "degraded frequency" of Maximum 20 MHz against to some inforequests as example 

UPDATE 12/26:

I carried-out sectional presentation about summaried what type a development for globe during solar impact.Where,I clearly sign to "three volumetric belt zone" based on impact direction.

Also,as evaluated,descripting developments related  as a reference of core region✋

UPDATE 12/27:

This example is expressing three zonal cond...Five zonal cond is linear belts reflected of ~25-27 MHz range and ~13-15 MHz range with 3-5 MHz range based on Max 35 MHz.

Other model is linear belt stru. related to 10000 boundary(as radius)  based on Max. 5 MHz.

You are right!You must handle redesign by core of upper model for five zone as geometric model...As evaluated,one zone is summarying  a geometry based on equatorial👍

Yes.Weak Solar Impact Period equatorial a geometry as sourced core,and next,Very Powerful Solar Impact  Period descripts five zone as sourced core✋

Where,equatorial expression maybe can cause a confusion...I express to 'maximum linear globe belt' expressed of 10000 distance(as radius).So,conds related to real equator zone are not subject👍

This is a reality😌zonal descriptions are reflection of conds fixed on individual experiments of routine seismic regions as longrange!!!I especially interest to this point.So,I underline of a reality cond of ~ this range/s😐

Interestingly,we are not observing any informations by sources as researchgate related to such a discipline🤔Really amazing!

Proved as a whole model thesis sourced core via reference of D-Region Absorbtion Data on this blog...