Another Analysis Conclusion by Seismic Shock Thesis

Summarying perfect correlation referencing seismic shock thesis M4.4 event(W Rotorua) of Jun12 and M5.0 event(Southern Mid-Atlantic Ridge) of Jun14 with M5.3 event(N of Franz Josef Land) of Jun8


Ekrem ERKUŞ

Geophysics Eng/TURKEY


Update 6/23:

Sensing as selective by seismic shock thesis M4.1_E Quillagua of Jun11 and  M4.9_E of Severnaya Zemlya of Jun15 referencing M6.2_Western Indian-Antarctic Ridge event of Jun8


 I sign to M6.2_Western Indian-Antartic Ridge event again.Expressing good correlation condition W Takotna developments of Jun13&Jun14  with M4.7_Central Mid-Atlantic Ridge of Jun7 based on event region


I evaluate as a whole M4.2_SE Los Andes event of Jun3 with M4.6_S Tari event of Jun29 again referencing M4.0_SE Mostar event of June1


I observe a correlation based on M4.8_W Chonchi of Jun7 with M4.6_FarSE Kirakira of May30 referencing M4.0_SE Mostar again


I referenced M4.0_SE Mostar again.Expressing perfect correlation M4.6_LosPalos Trench of May30 with M4.5_FarSW Villa Basilio Nievas of Jun1


Update 6/24:

Analysis based on M4.0_NWestern Hong Kong of Jun23 shows correlation to M5.1_E S Sandwich Isls&M4.9_E S Sandwich Isls of Jun20 with Riverton event of Jun17


Observing correation to M4.6_Prince Edward Isls Region of Jun29 with M4.3_SE Minatitlan Jun21 of  analysis referencing NW Hong Kong event of Jun23 again


Interesting Southern Cyprus event of Jun23.Expressing correlation M4.3_LaGomera Trench event of Jun22 with M5.1 and M4.4 events(SW Stewart Isl) of Jun18 referencing this event


I sign to M4.6_Matthew and M4.6_New Caledonia  Subduction events of 20 and 21 with M5.2_S Guayaquil event of Jun21 focusing Southern Cyprus event again


Very interesting Southern Cyprus event.Evaluating correlation to M4.4 and M5.5 San Cristobal Isl events of 23 and 24 with M4.6_S Pucalpa of Jun23.Another solution as correlation with M4.7 event of Jun23 Regione Itahuania M4.5 and M4.0 events of Jun24 Senggi Region.Other solution,a correlation based on M4.6&M4.3 AbraPampa events of Jun16&Jun18 with M4.4_SantaCruz Isls event of Jun15



Update 6/25:


Interesting M4.1_Central Okhotsksea event of Jun23.Analysis conclusion is summarying a correlation based on M4.9_Mid-Indian Ridge event of Jun24 with M5.2_SE Guayaquil event of Jun21


I sign correlation to M4.9_Mid-Indian Ridge event of Jun24 and M4.4_N Trinidad event of Jun24 of other analysis referencing Central Okhotsksea event again 


I observe M4.4_NW Riosucio event of Jun23 with M4.9_Mid-Indian Ridge event of Jun24 as another solution of Central Okhotsksea event


Other solution of Central Okhotsksea event,M4.9_Mid-Indian Ridge event of Jun24 with M4.7_FarNE Cusco event of Jun23



Other selective developments Pacific-Antarctic Ridge events of Jun12.In this base,interesting as correlation W Oregon Events of Jun16 with Yemensea Ridge event of Jun6 


I sign to N Socotra events of Jun16 with Upper Alkali Lake event of Jun5 as other solution of Pacific-Antarctic Ridge events


Pacific-Antarctic Ridge events are interesting.Thus,signing as correlation to Sapphire Mountain Province event of Jun20 with M4.2_SE Keleme event of Jun17


Observing based on NE Velma events of Jun13 with N Socotra events of Jun16 again other example for relationship conditions as correlation of Pacific-Antarctic Ridge events


Update June26:


Note.Experimentalists of this field will evaluate that although there is absolute knowledge of two points, there are sometimes uncertainties for the third point.Yes,you are right!sometimes,maybe including a bit "uncertainty"  a determination considering diameter for third point determination.Yes,you are right,you must discuss via this perspective my infosharings based on this concept.After this explanation,I think sharing diametrical snapshot info for some blurred "third point fields".


I will continue analysis of Pacific-Antarctic Ridge Events.Expressing a correlation for Mid-Northern Tibet event of Jun5 with N Events PuertoRico of Jun7



I cite correlation of Central Mid-Atlantic Ridge events of Jun19 referencing Jun12.But,I present a description based on note for third point;



 I will sign a focus region as other solution of Pacific-Antarctic Ridge events.I evaluate M4.4 event of Jun6 as a seismic shock effect of incredible Noto Peninsula Earthquake of 2024.Yes,you are right,thus,a solution M4.7_Central Mid-Atlantic Ridge event of Jun7 


I say a correlation based on N Events Scipio of Jun16 with offshore Pasni of June14 among solutions of Ridge events 6/12



By another anaysis,understanding a correlation with M2.0_S Champlain.But,expressing a blurry condition for third point;




Among selective seismic developments M3.8_offshore New Scotland event of Jun23.Analysis thus summarying a correlation based on M4.9_E S Sandwich Isls of Jun20 with M5.1_E Guguan of Jun19


Update 6/27:


Interesting M4.1_SapporoBay event of Jun26.Observing correlation to M4.9_Mid-Indian Ridge event of Jun24 with M4.3_Tamarindo Trench event of Jun25 of analysis based on this


Other interesting as location M4.0_E Dolinsk event of Jun26.My analysis summaries  a correlation for M4.6_Antaparco Province event of Jun21 with M4.9_Mid-Indian Ridge event  of Jun24


I express a correlation based on M4.2_N SyeverniBay event of May30.So,M4.6_Prince Edward Isls Region of May29 with M4.4_Provincia Parachique of June3.Observing M5.7_SW Arenas event of Jun5 as another solution of SyeverniBay and Prince Edward Isls Region.Expressing as developments based on May28 of offshore Nazca a solution referencing SyeverniBay event and Prince Edward Isls Region event again.I know as routine observer seismic developments of Regione Pucalpa.I interpret as a seismic shockwave development inthiscontext M4.4_N Pucalpa event of May28 based on SyeverniBay  and Prince Edward Isls Region again 


Interesting location for China M4.5_N Yichang event of Jun26.In this base,I express a correlation for M4.9_Southern East Pacific Rise event of Jun16 with Central Mid-Atlantic Ridge events of Jun19.Summarying correlation to SW Guatemala developments of Jun20 and Jun22 with M4.9_E S Sandwich Isls event of Jun20 other conclusion of analysis based on China event


Important Note:Where,I summary a "first determination step" as "most applicable"  based on tool capabilities of Google Earth .Yes,you should be able to solve  "median new circle problem" considering third point by   2 fix point  as second step.Yes,if you have this capability,my descriptions mean important discoveries for related geoenvs


Update Jun30:

Expressing correlation to LaSerena developments of Jun24&Jun28 with M5.5_SE San Cristobal of Jun24 an analysis based on M4.2_NE Stavropol of Jun29.Other interesting regions as correlation SW Samoa events of Jun26&Jun28 with M4.8_S Georgia Isl Region of Jun28.M4.9_NW Bougainville of Jun26 another solution based on NE Stavropol.Where,third point is blurred as regional;



Other correlation regions with M4.2_Jun29;

>M4.6_New Caledonia Trench,Jun21

>M4.4_Provincia Puente Alto,Juın21





Correlations with M5.3_Jun28;

>M5.5_NW Tonga Jun28

>Casapunta Region events of Jun24&Jun27


Correlations with same region;

>M4.4_Wellington Pass,Jun24

>M4.4_N Trinidad,Jun24


Correlations with same region;

>M4.7_Regione Salvacion,Jun23

>M4.6_Matthew Isl Region,Jun20


Correlations with M4.6_Deep Springs of Jun29;

>M4.0_NW Qingyuan,Jun23

>M5.1_S Sandwich Isls Region,Jun28


Correlations with same region;

>M6.2_Southern Mid-Atlantic Ridge,Jun26

>M4.7_Haruru Region,Jun22


Correlations with same region;

>M6.2_Southern Mid-Atlantic Ridge,Jun25

>M4.7_Haruru Region,Jun22


Correlations with M4.0_S Yanago of Jun29;

>M4.9_Mid-Indian Ridge,Jun24

>M4.5_Provincia Cardenas/NIC,Jun29


Correlations with same region;

>M4.3_SE Minatitlan,Jun21

>M4.9_Mid-Indan Ridge,Jun24


Correlations with same region;

>M4.4_N Trinidad,Jun24

third point is blurred as regional;




Update Aug1:

I thought role of a schematic description complementary referencing note of lastday;

Not.I am predicting such calculation procedures based on CAD literature.But,you will evaluate that software architecture is different headline.Where,I mean "no any problem" for solution of this type problem as computer aided  only.Thus,I will wait answers of related envs.Thus,thanks...

Yes,problem understood,name of problem is "re-desing maximum radius circle based on 2 fix point".I summary catching more clear informations based on discrimination of cumulation locations considering your dbase among other advantages for some geoenvs with this operation.


Yorumlar

Bu blogdaki popüler yayınlar

Interesting information intermsof Eartquake Statisticians

Obspy-about Developments