9/11_Analysis Conclusions on Globe Triangle Concept
Interesting information intermsof Eartquake Statisticians
Important year based on some earthquake events between 2010 and 2011; Feb27,2010>Chile Earthquake_M8.8-06:34 UTC Sep3,2010>New Zealand Earthquake_M7.2-16:35 UTC March11,2011>Japan Earthquake_M9.0-05:46 UTC Sep15,2011>Fiji Earthquake_M7.3-19:30 UTC As maybe more interesting,amazing correlation as time of events that 4522 hours and one minute between Chile and New Zealand Earthquakes 4525 hours and 11 minutes between New Zealand and Japan Earthquakes 4525 hours and 44 minutes between Japan and Fiji Earthquakes Yes,we are witnessing a "perfect equidistance" as 188 days ~!
By the way,I established a condition check on some dbase publishes about Impact Craters...Class-2 "Duolun Structure" confirmed me.Technic informations about structure:
YanıtlaSilCountry: China (Asia)
Diameter: 70-190 km
Position: 42.05, 116.25
Age: 129 ± 2 Million Years
Drilled?:
Exposed?:
Description: Several abstracts describe a multiring impact structure ~200 km north of Beijing, China. These papers recognize inner structural ring 70 km in diameter marking occurrences of various breccias, middle ring 120 km in diameter and an outer ring 190 km in diameter. A range of various impact breccias and megabreccias, suevites, impact melt sheets with mineral fragments and microlites, aerodynamically shaped melt bombs with schlieren and fluidized ejecta have been reported but almost no data were presented to support these claims (Siben, 1987; Siben and Shuyuan, 1987; Wu and Zhang, 1987; Siben, 1989; Wu, 1989; Wu, 1990; Wu and Zhang, 1992). The target consists of granodiorite, shale siltstone, sandstone, limestone, and andesite; the andesites are of the Upper Jurasic age. Coal deposits found via drilling in the western peripheral trough (>600 m deep) is lower Cretaceous. K-Ar age of the interpreted impact melt is 129 ± 2 Ma (Siben, 1987). All data in the database are taken from (Siben, 1987). The significance of the K/Ar age is uncertain considering the lack of data on the structure. Also, if the melt sample is indeed from impact and contains fragments of minerals the K-Ar is almost certainly inaccurate. The uncertainty range listed in the database is therefore taken from the stratigraphic constraints (D. Rajmon). The base Upper Jurassic and top lower Cretaceous are calibrated with Gradstein et al. (2004).
Subject a M5.6 event(Fiji region) among tectonic region alerts during controls(expressed as triangle frame).
YanıtlaSilIn the other hand,I observed some events for NZ trench region between M4.0-M5.0 environment among descripted tectonic regions
YanıtlaSil